![]() These are small structures in the picture on higher ISO, which are a result of converting the Fuji-data into cameraraw. With X-E3 I had - like other users too - big trouble with "worming". That's bad - because when I like the jpeg and just want to push something, I have to touch the RAF and start my editing from scretch. Biggest issue on LR: the in-camera film-emulation-settings just worked on jpeg, the RAF stayed untouched. Since I shot more OOC-Jpeg with film-emulations, I had some big issues with color-correction. At the beginning my CameraRaw wasn't up2date - I had to convert my RAF to DNG to open it correctly. I have issues with Fuji RAF since my X-E1. ![]() My workflow with Lightroom is quick and stable, I tried other applications and some of them have "better/more" functions which I don't use for my editing. Well, I'm using Lightroom since version 3, for now I use Classic. Some even use the Express version as their main editing suite indefinitely. no sessions), you could get familiar with Capture One's workflow, functionality and output before you have to decide. If you're curious, there is a free variant (not a trial version!) called Capture One Express for Fujifilm. While both solutions have strengths and weaknesses (I tried to be balanced above), I've come to feel very much at home with Capture One. I can't remember the exact year I switched to Capture One, I think it's been seven years. If you frequently use HDR bracketing and panoramic stitching, these two functions are also new to Capture One's latest version and not quite mature yet, compared to Adobe's offering. Both these features have only been recently introduced for Capture One with (comparatively speaking) limited functionality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |